Very Demotivational Posters that Demotivate Us

 

« Previous | Next »


Vampires

Vampires

Submitted by: dunno source via deMotivational Builder

Incorrect source or offensive?
  • Share on Facebook
  • Copy & paste this:

» See all 136 comments

  1. Kees says:

    Hm, this one isn’t that good. Good demotivational posters are Tagline – joke. Too many lines at the bottom.

  2. Snath says:

    DO NOT HAVE MULLETS
    DO NOT WEAR DUSTERS
    DO NOT DYE THEIR HAIR BLOND

  3. Christian says:

    OMG… Is that… Jack Bauer?

  4. Rawrii says:

    The whole “VAMPIRES DON’T SPARKLE!!” thing has been a bit played out for some time now.

    • CNinja says:

      It deserves repeating until people get it.

    • Lost_Girl says:

      Well umm…. Hate to ruin it for everyone because it slightly ruined it for me but they do sorta sparkle in this movie. When the frog brothers are standing next to the cliff wiping off the blood if you look closly the blood sparkles in the sunlight. Its not just a *wet sparkle* its a glitter sparkle.

      • Sekritasianman07 says:

        Crappy effects that were unintentional are not to be compared with completely intentional full body sparkling. (I’m so ashamed of sparkling when the sun hits me) YEah because girls care about that.

        “I’m not gay… or a stripper… I just have a skin disorder” would be more like it.

        • NiCad says:

          Crikey, I thought Vampyres actually burned, caught fire or their skin boils up when exposed to sunlight. NOT THIS SPARKLY BULLSH*T!!!

          NZLD

          -NiCad Drag Racer-

          • Floraloves says:

            It wasn’t crappy effects…watch the special features…it’s completely intentional. The sparkles were to make it and I quote “sexier.” While I prefer The Lost Boys to Twilight any day, I cannot deny the facts.

    • lowlife1220 says:

      yeah but its very very true… also Michael J. Fox was a better werewolf then Taylor *shark boy* Lautner

  5. rahowa says:

    “… DRINK BLOOD . MURDER PEOPLE . AREN’T REAL : /”

  6. Sarah says:

    You use the douche from Buffy the Vampire Slayer (the movie) to prove this? How about the Jim Morrison look alike from the Lost Boys? Val Kilmer? Brad Pitt? Bella Lagosi?

  7. Parydy says:

    Yup, I am demotivated by this

  8. SAJ says:

    That’s Kiefer Sutherland and I’m pretty sure he wasn’t in Buffy. Plus he’s a cool guy. Nice poster.

  9. venomlash says:

    This IS from The Lost Boys. It’s David, played by Kiefer Sutherland.

  10. Mike says:

    I’ve always imagined taking a twilight vampire, hanging him from his feet upside-down, opening a skylight and using his sparkliness to create a disco ball. Spin him around. Play some disco songs.

    • valerie says:

      You know, I enjoyed Twilight (the books), and that still sounds like fun. Since Robert Pattinson (spelling?) is otherwise uselss, we might as well use him. Although it would be a broody disco ball…

    • jdude321 says:

      Stayin’ alive, stayin’ alive! Ah, ah, ah, ah, stayin’ alive!

  11. Tera says:

    Not BtVS… yeesh. Gonna call someone out, get your facts straight. That’s Keefer Sutherland of Lost Boys.

  12. Rich says:

    Then again, this vampire got pwned by the Coreys.

  13. Luvcanal says:

    a friend of mine told me recently that the new moon is the story of a girl stuggling to choose between necrophilia and beastiality

  14. Coco says:

    I hate Twilight but…. Vampires are fictional characters that can be portrayed as one may want. It’s like spelling yay! or jeeey! can be spelled how a person wants since it’s just a sound.
    Vampires change through-out movies how the director or author wants them. They can be hideous or be gorgeous…etc.

    • Reki says:

      Blade – They ashed
      Underworld – They burned
      Dracula – He burned
      Van Helsing – They burned
      Twilight – They sparkle

      I think that the whole, vampires can be what the author/director wants is taken a little too far in Twilight. Vampires are to burn in sunlight, not sparkle. It is what makes them vampires to begin with.

      • valerie says:

        Dracula didn’t burn in sunlight. He went out in the sunlight. Also, Ann Rice’s more powerful vampires don’t burn. They tan.

        • Jessi says:

          Uh… NO. Dracula did NOT go out in sunlight. Are you referring to that hack-job movie they made a while back? The one they named after Bram Stoker then totally DESTROYED his book? If so, fail.

    • Madcapfeline says:

      Creative license is one thing. All the Shakespearean remakes, modern spin on a classic tale, that’s creative license. Which is also stupid, but that’s just my opinion. If you’re gonna tell a story, tell an original story. If you can’t tell an original story, then go work at Burger King, where you belong. Anywho…

      Completely changing or leaving out commonly acctepted “truths” so you can make it pretty and sell it to tweeny girls is something beyond creative license.

      Inaccuracies aside, Twilight is the literary equivalent to Valium. Again, just my opinion.

      • Jessi says:

        I don’t know you. But I like you. :)

        WIN!

        Vampires aren’t just characters to be used at a writer’s whim. They’re myths. That means they have a specific set of attributes that MAKE them vampires. These attributes have been accepted as vampiric for centuries. Such as, they DIE in sunlight and they’re pure evil. Messing with that means whatever hybrid… thing… you come up with is NOT a vampire. It’s called “definition”.

    • Sekritasianman07 says:

      NO offense but, if I write about a vampire… make him hairy all over… change his teeth up slightly… make him transform at the full moon… I’ve lost the right to call him a vampire, because he’s now a werewolf.

      Same goes for twilight… they are no longer vampires… they are now f***s.

      • Lex Griffiths says:

        Um… you’re allowed to swear on the internet. No one’s going to take your broadband away for use of obscenities. Personally I dislike the series, but because Meyer is a poor writer, NOT because the vampires sparkle. Furthermore considering that the original vampires of eastern European myth closer resembled modern zombies with a taste for blood (sometimes they didn’t even drink blood ) rather than Dracula or Lestat… well, the “they’re not real vampires” argument falls a bit flat I feel.

        • Ross says:

          I totally hate what twilight has done to the genre. Especially as Meyer is making money by ripping off Joss Whedon but vampires burning in sunlight is only an invention of the last 100years or so. Before that they had no problem going out in the day. However, sparkling, come on, really? That’s the lamest thing I’ve ever heard for something that’s supposed to be a curse.

  15. Randominsanity says:

    Bela Lugosi spent ages making vampires feared, as did Bram stoker. With the invention of twilight they are now turning in their graves.

  16. Roger says:

    I’ve got to agree, great idea, weak execution. There are much, much more brutal non-sparkly vampire pix available. A few classics include:
    a) the actual dude himself, at his labours, from a contemporary woodcut: http://www.varvar.ru/arhiv/slovo/images/vlad_drakula.jpg
    b) the original movie version: http://www.mad-monsters.com/Wallpapers/images/nosferatu.jpg
    c) Christopher Lee: http://blogs.citypages.com/amadzine/images/Christopher_lee.jpg
    and some slightly more modern versions, still sans sparkles:
    http://dark.pozadia.org/images/wallpapers/lucy_westenra_1600_1200-134213.jpeg
    and my personal fave, inspired by Shrek’s Nosferatu:
    http://www.psychoform.com/htmlgallery/nosferatu_002.jpg

  17. Philip says:

    SEE USING ECHOLOCATION
    SLEEP UPSIDE DOWN IN CAVES
    VOMIT BLOOD INTO EACH OTHERS MOUTHS

    or they are oxymoronic.

    But how is this demotivational? This is just another one of the easiest, least original and most hypocritical* possible slam at something: bashing twilight. And bashing a poor defenseless girl and a high school student** just isn’t very nice.

    * Hypocritical, because many of the so very common complaints about twilight is that it’s poor quality and it’s popularity is based on it’s popularity. But those very complaints are mostly due to other people stating those complaints, and their associated bashes are often poor in quality themselves.

    ** I actually had to use wikipedia to find out what she does other than hang out with a vampire. And from what I’ve heard of you guys, I’m proud I know so little. Ignorance is bliss, or so you give the impression.

  18. Rogue says:

    As a “demotivational poster”, I think it does not show understanding of the concept. I see most of these as fail. Check out the “Relationships” one a couple of posts up for an example of HOW THIS IS DONE.

    I would have used Lestat and said: “VAMPIRES. Its only in your very last moments of life that you realize they aren’t sparkly at all.”

    There, you see? It follows the correct format, has a really EVIL vampire, and still gets in the jab at Twilight. I never get tired of the jabs at Twilight. Even my 12 year old daughter hates it.

    • sophie says:

      so I heard that Robert Pattinson, now deemed sexier than Johnny Depp (who did they survey?!), was so stinky on set that he was finally sent home to bathe.
      BTW, I have never watched any of the Twilight series and never will. Yay!!

    • Krypto says:

      i wouldnt really consider lestat evil… at least not REALLY evil

  19. qwerty says:

    I went to my local bookstore and they had a vampire section, and not one of the books was Bram Stoker’s Dracula. I found a copy and moved it there.

  20. Camilla says:

    it appears as though most of you are bitter about the fact that keifer sutherland got such fame for HAVING a mullet, OR, you’re just bitter that your love of Twilight has been crushed by some random people on the internet. how do YOU know they don’t wear dusters? maybe they DID, in the 80′s, or MAYBE they even wore BOMBER JACKETS. oh noez. i think this is great. but you know, maybe they do sparkle. in bed. lol.

  21. SystematicChaos says:

    Edward Cullen is not a vampire.

    Dio Brando is a vampire.

    Enough said.

  22. Jami says:

    If you all hate this one so much then go to (currently page six) find the one called Curves, the only good one mesofunny actually has ever made, and vote it up instead.

  23. Katie says:

    I love Kiefer Sutherland and hate Twilight, so this is a double win, IMO.

  24. Toby Jugs says:

    They don’t live in caves and have feet like bats either!

  25. mgensemer says:

    Finally someone else that doesn’t like twilight. HORRAAAH!!One of the top 10 vamp movies.

  26. lindsay says:

    lol, oh teenagers and their fantasy’s. a little bit of realistic measure never hurt anyone though.

  27. blahblah says:

    His head made me think of Dio Brando actually

  28. connor says:

    oh hell yes!!!

  29. STU says:

    Wait now, I dont have a mullet, but I do wear a duster….I al more like a white version of blade. :)

  30. Say Say =^_^= says:

    HOLY SWEAR WORDS! I LOVE WHOEVER MADE THIS (not actually… But I love this freaking picture…).

  31. Jack Bauer says:

    But, you know, the hair kinda looks the same…

  32. Mary says:

    Has anyone ever seen that movie. Well let me tell you, this is a BADASS. BADASS. Go watch the lost boys and then tell me it’s a fail.

    Keifer, you win.

  33. Draq says:

    What’s next? Romantic Zombies?

  34. mike patterson says:

    “Romantic Vampires”– Underworld

    Lost Boys—great movie
    Keifer–great in LB and in “Truth or Consequences, New Mexico”

    John Carpenter’s Vampires with James Woods
    30 Days of Night

    Loved the “Peter Pan” bits of Lost Boys “The boys need a mother…..

  35. eliza says:

    yes they do!!!

  36. SamfiSh says:

    “Have mullets”

  37. zee says:

    I just can’t believe that you people are actually taking it THIS seriously as if it matters what you say and what you think. It’s just a funny poster directed toward the anit-twilight crowd. So a theological discussion about what vampires (fictional characters in the first place) are to do in the sun is simply useless.

  38. Penquin says:

    omfg how come every time there’s a twilight related poster on here people freak out and flock to their anti and pro armies can’t you just “lol” it and move on?

  39. t3hn00b says:

    ARGUING ON THE INTERNET = PARTICIPATING IN THE SPECIAL OLYMPICS
    whether you win or lose, you’re still retarded.

    watching Lost Boys. epic win XD

  40. Ray says:

    Y’know, I loved that movie, but now every time I watch it, I can’t help but wait for the head Vampire to ask Corey Haim if he wants to buy a Dodge.

  41. doom says:

    The ones that sparkle are all Gay

  42. Karen says:

    Is this a real poster? Where do I get one?

  43. Noodles says:

    I thought that just one Twilight vampire went to high school, and that there were something like ten of them.

  44. Zenki says:

    Not completely true, if you’ve ever read Vladimir Tod, you know that vampires can go to high school.

  45. bobw says:

    well i remember when they sucked blood and not d~ck

  46. Doctor Acula says:

    (In David Attenborough’s Voice)

    Now, I know some people are confused as to what does and does not make a vampire. Most true vampires burn in sunlight, there are daywalkers, but the ability is quite rare. And all Vampires subsist on blood. Typically human or at the very least mammalian. Shape-shifting and flying depend on the species of vampire. There are several different species and they display different facial characteristics and abilities.

    Non-vampire blood drinkers include Kui-Jin, Carniverous Elves (or Unseelie), and mosquitos.

    Again, while were wolves do have the ability to shape shift, not all shape-shifters are Were Wolves. There are Native American Skin Walkers, Gangrel (a vampire species), warg, lycans (possible sub-species of vampires), and yennork.

    Below is video of a typical vampire feeding it its natural habitat:

    Here is a typical vampire courtship ritual:

    And this is the vampire asserting it’s dominence:

    Notice the lack of sparkling.

  47. I love this pic but I would because I made it next time ask I dont mind sharing


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s