Why would you say screw you then put a smiley face? and I think she was joking. When she said “First to reply to this comment” or whatever wouldn’t that be making fun of the guy who said first to comment on the picture? I think I’m the only one who got it..
Not necessarily. I know people who dislike both. I think the point is that Voldemort was the one who killed Cedric, who was played by the same actor as Edward.
Yeah, the movies aren’t all too good. What’s totally awesome is A Very Potter Musical and A Very Potter Sequel. If you haven’t seen AVPM, go to YouTube, watch it now, then watch AVPS.
I can see the resemblance to Edward, but anyone who has seen the fourth movie will go WTF. I did when I first saw it. The I realized that was supposed to be Edward
Pattinson isn’t that bad of an actor. The only movies people actually see him in is the Twilight series. It is just nearly impossible to make a role in Twilight work. He is actually decent in other movies, from what I have seen.
Here’s the weird thing, Harry Potter is almost as hyped as Twilight. Read some of the books, saw a few movies, got bored as hell. Not horrible and culturally humiliating like Twilight, but Harry Potter is by no means close to say Lord of the Rings, the Star Wars OT, and Indiana Jones. Uh, 1 and 3. They’re just above average kids books essentially, with places like “The Forbidden Forest” and “Invisibility Cloaks,” not really that much imagination to come up with names like those.
No, I’m not trolling, though I am sure some HP fan is going to give me an ear full.
I really can’t get how people are going “HP is no better than Twilight”. I mean, I read all of HP books, and enjoyed all of them, but I couldn’t even finish the first Twilight book, it seemed as if it there was no structure in writing the “book” or the chapters, talking about stuff just to fill the blanks, while in HP, you can find stuff that appeared in the first book, reappearing in the final book, you can feel the plot.
What you call lack of imagination is actually not overdoing it, coming up with names to every single object can be pretty much annoying for the readers. And I believe JK Rowling proved enough imagination through out the books.
Regardless of all these arguments, Harry potter > Twilight.
Harry Potter is better than Twilight, but I found it to be trite myself. I’ve read the Lord of the Rings, and it was taxing, but seeing the movies and reading the books again helped further my patience for reading the detail.
Essentially the difference between studying a great Renaissance piece for an hour, which may seem tedious, but well worth the knowledge, to seeing a piece of art done by a talented high schooler imitating the Renaissance piece. Twilight is the scribbles you do while taking notes in class.
E-Nerds just trying to hype themselves up with the ol’ I’m to cool to read Harry Potter but let me pick up this finger snapping book on starbucks coffee poetry cause thats hip. *snaps fingers* I haven’t read a Harry Potter book, didn’t care for the movies at first but its starting to grow on me. Its a great series for kids so you can’t compare it to Starwars which was directed towards young adults.
I’ve always liked Harry Potter. But the main thing that bothers me about twilight is not the story, it’s the girls and the vampires. How they act like they are vampires and think Edward or Jacob or what’s his face is going to be there husband. It’s just – Ughhhh. Another thing is how they totally screwed up Vampires. I’ve always liked Vampires and myths, but sparkling – WTF!
That’s exactly what I was thinking. I watched the first Twilight and found it kinda interesting except for the sparklyness. Now I fkn hate Twilight because ALL the girls around my age LOVE Edward or Jacob. It is so god damn annoying! >:(
Hey E-tard.. so you must be punched in the head three times cause you just committed all three acts
1. To make this assestment you also must have known which movie it was from.
2. Apparently you knew who Edward is to make such a comment. (everyone actually knows who edward is on this site not to mention Twilight is in the news, at burger king and vomiting out of fangirl’s mouths)
3. You just said Twilight and Harry Potter in the same post! WOot
I’m sick of this “you all won the game” s**t. There’s a demotivational from 4chan where a guy claims it from doubles or something, too..
A comic making a joke or a guy who reposted repeatedly til the 10% chance went his way doesn’t render the game invalid, nor does it make it kewl to go on about it as if it’s true, or as if playing along with it is funny..
*twitch*
This is mainly a response to Justice; first off, would like to say, yes, the first 3 harry potter books are only so-so… what makes THEM survive is their level of immersion and interesting characters (most notable fred and george in my opinion, but I digress)… HOWEVER, once you start getting into book 4, JK Rowling’s becomes a far better WRITER, and the PLOTS grow up. So book 1-3 is a 11 to 13 year olds perspective… not very exciting, although it has its moments. but once Harry gets to be 14, and *SPOILER ALERT FOR NON HARRY POTTER FANS* Voldemort comes back, then things become darker, more mature, more intriguing, etc etc. The books grow from there
and Because I KNOW some1 is going to argue this, that harry is the most boring character ever, yes, he is. Because its FROM his point of view (albeit in 3rd person). The character growth is not nobody to somebody, or neutral to good in alignment. We don’t see any of that from HIS perspective. Or we don’t see MUCH of it. Point is, the growth we do see is in CAPABILITY. Because, frankly, unless your a self examining person, who ACTUALLY notices how they change in life? Just my 2 cents…
And yes, her imagination for certain names was limited, but ur forgetting Gringotts, Diagon Alley, Knockturn Alley, Hogwarts… etc etc. Chmicha was right, its hard to keep making up names. I as a writer can attest to that. And finally, what WOULD you call the invisibility cloak, other than an invisibility cloak?
So. There’s your ‘earful’ hope its more rational than you were expecting.
AND YES. DUH. I’m a HP fan
I know there’s really no point to asking this, but, can’t someone love both HP and Twilight? Sure, neither will be confused for great literature, to stand the test of time. But both are a lot of fun.
I agree that HP comes into its own somewhere around the third book. And GoF is prolly my favorite of the 6 films. And not because of Pattinson. Twilight works for me because of the core romance. I sympathize with Bella’s mear-mindless determination to join Eds in eternity.
Personally, I get a chuckle out of all the hate. Stuff like Twilight + vuvuzelas. All the demotivators. I laugh. But I still enjoy the books. And am looking forward to reading #4, so no spoilers, please! ^.~
actual spoiler: bella gets pregnant and edward performs a c-section on her with his teeth after which jacob marks the baby so he can f*** it when it becomes 8 or 9 and gets an adult body… for some reason.
Jk Rowling not Rowling’s*
also, remove AND before because I know. Sorry, but since I can’t edit the post directly, it was nagging at me to correct my own grammar where it was the worst. worse or worst?
hmmmmmmm.
Harry Potter is ten million times better than Twilight can ever hope to be. Infact, I posted on a Twilight YouTube vid, trolling the Twilight fans, once, saying how much better Harry Potter is, someone said that Harry Potter is good, but Twilight is better… what kind of drugs are Twilight fans on?
I really hate it when people compare Twilight and HP.
I like both, and both of them have their strong and weak points.
Twilight: Edward or Jacob? Everyone knows who she chooses by reading the last sentence of the third book.
HP: Daniel looked and sounded like a girl for the first two movies, and there are so many cheesy moments that I lost track.
No he didn’t, because he is a book and movie character. Harry doesn’t even have an opinion of Twilight, because of the aforementioned being a book and movie character.
He cried in sympathy because he knew Cedric was doomed to be reincarnated into a tween romance hero with a higher ratio of angst to external conflict for ALL ETERNITY.
Potter is plagiarized crap engineered by at least a half-dozen hack writers and promoted and protected by the British establishment including the BBC and you have all been BRAINWASHED!
Correction: Voldemort hates Twilight. Harry just made sure everybody saw.
And y’know, I actually kind of like Pattinson better in Harry Potter than in Twilight. It’s the character. I’ve read all of the Harry Potter books and all but the ending of the last Twilight book. I love Harry Potter, but not enough that I stuff it up everyone’s asses wherever I go. I’m not a fan of Twilight(various spelling/grammar errors, etc.) but I don’t shove my opinion up fangirl’s asses either.
They’re fricking books, get the hell over it and get a life.
I am a big HP fan, the HP books are much better written and planned out than the twilight books. As you read the series (And I admitt the first three books are a little kid-ish) it does become darker, more intense, and more interesting.
As far as the movies go, the first movie was done by a different director than the one that is directing them now, obviously there is a big difference…
Twilight is just not that well written, it’s like a ten year old could have written that. Stephanie Meyer is just successful because, too many people are idiots. I don’t care if you like Twilight, but I had those fanatics……
I admit I snickered a bit when I read that Voldemort hates Twilight.
I agree with Justice and Ivy. In HP, you could see the growth of the writing and the characters as the story progressed and the ending wasn’t an epic squick and failfest like it was in Twilight.
Meyer’s work reads like a teenage girl’s sexual fantasies that should have been edited properly to even bring it up to some kind of conclusion. The one reason why they’re successful is because a lot of women never outgrew that teenage angst and being in love with a guy who clearly is a contender for a restraining order. If you’re a 16 year old…I can see why you’d want to read this. But as an older woman…oh lord…
This scene is from “Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire”
Robert Pattinson was really in this film!
this is Robert Pattinson’s 3rd film.
before he was Edward from twilight
Kids like 6-13 are down with HP then there’s a stretch from 13-18 where you’re a teenage retard who determinedly does not like Harry Potter because it might ruin your social standing with your fellow retard friends, then when you’re an adult you realize how much of a retard you were and give it a shot..
Anyone who says HP is as bad as Twilight probably hasn’t read them.
yes. twilight isnt a very good series. most people can agree on that. but you must think, that since it’s never going to be amazing, no matter what they do with it, but it still is so popular, there will always be ppl who will hate it. (another example is justin bieber) but HP is different, it is told from a guys point of view as he grows up. HE’S 11 WHEN IT ALL STARTS! i mean, it’s not supposed to be super mature in the first books, because you’re not at that age. and when you think about it, the whole series is layers upon layers of creativity. (i know imma dork, but i’ve been asked before so i know) the names she comes up with have meaning behind them. she creates this magical world…different from any other kind. most people when they read it, only get the first sketch, not the whole picture. if you’ve read the books more than once, you get the whole idea she’s made. and everything that goes along with it. and people shouldn’t EVER rate a book on what the movies like. yes daniel sounded like a girl the first 2 movies. becasue he was 11 when they started. it’s caled: he hadn’t gone through puberty. (i can go on, but i won’t. bc i’m saving you from my dorkishly large amt of knowledge on this series)
It’s very sad. And HP > Twilight. Sorry, twihards. I’d take interesting (though sometimes predictable) characters and an original, interesting world over OMG HE’S SPARKLY any day of the week.
I’ve made it a personal mission to hate Twilight with a passion for the rest of my natural life but after being forced to watch Eclipse by a friend’s gf I actually had a critic for it that wasn’t based off my loathing of the franchise. At times the action and what not would get somewhat decent really, but then it would always without fail be quickly demolished, trampled, and utterly raped by the actors poor acting. The lines while they made sense for whatever scene it was, sounded horrid and unconvincing. While the story is still a steaming pile of festering vampire glitter, could have been a lot better if the people playing the roles didn’t suck. As far as HP goes, love the books, great story that you can really get in to. Though the movies (not including 1 and 2) I don’t really care for. They strayed to far from the book in key detailing and what not. 1 and 2 stuck pretty close to the books. Plus original Dumbledore was way better then his replacement.
HAH! you’re not first!
HAH! First to reply to this guys comment! SUCK IT, EVERYONE ELSE!
suck what? i cant find anything
Bahaha x]
this is too good
that’s what she said!
ring ring ring ring…
Bananaphone??
Ding, dong, ding, dong, ding, dong…
DANANA PHOOOOONE
boop boop ba doop a doop…
monorail!
cat!
Lol
They should make a poster of this picture! I loved it!
PS: Whats the deal about being the first? Grow up! The comment should be about the picture, so screw you =]
Why would you say screw you then put a smiley face? and I think she was joking. When she said “First to reply to this comment” or whatever wouldn’t that be making fun of the guy who said first to comment on the picture? I think I’m the only one who got it..
LOL this is mad one
I agree with above.. Harry Potter hates Twilight
I think Voldemort is the one who hates Twilight
I’m sure we can agree that we all hate twilight
i second that
Amen.
Nope!
i hate you
I think deep down she hates herself too.
I think that deep down you probably hate yourself.
. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . ,.-‘”. . . . . . . . . .“~.,
. . . . . . . .. . . . . .,.-”. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .“-.,
. . . . .. . . . . . ..,/. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ”:,
. . . . . . . .. .,?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .\,
. . . . . . . . . /. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,}
…. . . . . . . . ./. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,:`^`.}
. . . . . . . ./. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,:”. . . ./
. . . . . . .?. . . __. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :`. . . ./
. . . . . . . /__.(. . .“~-,_. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,:`. . . .. ./
. . . . . . /(_. . ”~,_. . . ..“~,_. . . . . . . . . .,:`. . . . _/
. . . .. .{.._$;_. . .”=,_. . . .“-,_. . . ,.-~-,}, .~”; /. .. .}
. . .. . .((. . .*~_. . . .”=-._. . .“;,,./`. . /” . . . ./. .. ../
. . . .. . .\`~,. . ..“~.,. . . . . . . . . ..`. . .}. . . . . . ../
. . . . . .(. ..`=-,,. . . .`. . . . . . . . . . . ..(. . . ;_,,-”
. . . . . ../.`~,. . ..`-.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..\. . /\
. . . . . . \`~.*-,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..|,./…..\,__
,,_. . . . . }.>-._\. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .|. . . . . . ..`=~-,
. .. `=~-,_\_. . . `\,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .\
. . . . . . . . . .`=~-,,.\,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .\
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . `:,, . . . . . . . . . . . . . `\. . . . . . ..__
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .`=-,. . . . . . . . . .,%`>–==“
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _\. . . . . ._,-%. . . ..`\.
don’t tell me i’m the only one that joined the death eaters for that reason!
I thought it strange that the death eaters looked like a magical british version of the KKK….
ROFL And I thought I was the only one who thought that…. =)
Wait… if Voldy hates Twilight… Doesn’t that mean he’s on Harry’s side?
Not necessarily. I know people who dislike both. I think the point is that Voldemort was the one who killed Cedric, who was played by the same actor as Edward.
And this is why I pay more attention to the credits. o:
harry potter is not that great ethier
Still better than twilight. o.e
still better than twilight? thats an accomplishment how?
*less worst
There’s no sparkly vampires, but yeah, still bad.
Let me guess. You haven’t read Harry Potter?
yea dont diss the books just the movies (for twilight u can diss it all)
Yeah, the movies aren’t all too good. What’s totally awesome is A Very Potter Musical and A Very Potter Sequel. If you haven’t seen AVPM, go to YouTube, watch it now, then watch AVPS.
Make sure to kill it with fire!
? Nerd fail?
Not from that angle he doesn’t.
Win.
I can see the resemblance to Edward, but anyone who has seen the fourth movie will go WTF. I did when I first saw it. The I realized that was supposed to be Edward
I think everyone who has seen the fourth Harry Potter isn’t better than any twilight girlie…
but my parents forced me to see it =(
actually it’s the same “actor”
Oh it is? Hmmm, I like him as Cedric better. And the only reason I saw the fourth movie is, because I read the books first
Pattinson isn’t that bad of an actor. The only movies people actually see him in is the Twilight series. It is just nearly impossible to make a role in Twilight work. He is actually decent in other movies, from what I have seen.
I know! Why did Cedric have to die? If he lived for the other books/movies, Robert Pattinson’s talent wouldn’t be wasted on Twilight.
Correction…Pattinson is a TERRIBLE actor. Just watched Remember Me and he sucked there also!
of course he sucks. thats the hole damn point of vampires! id just prefer he’d suck the blood of twilightfans
uhm… The guy that played Cedric in the Harry Potter movies IS the same guy that plays Edward. You’re a moron.
Here’s the weird thing, Harry Potter is almost as hyped as Twilight. Read some of the books, saw a few movies, got bored as hell. Not horrible and culturally humiliating like Twilight, but Harry Potter is by no means close to say Lord of the Rings, the Star Wars OT, and Indiana Jones. Uh, 1 and 3. They’re just above average kids books essentially, with places like “The Forbidden Forest” and “Invisibility Cloaks,” not really that much imagination to come up with names like those.
No, I’m not trolling, though I am sure some HP fan is going to give me an ear full.
I really can’t get how people are going “HP is no better than Twilight”. I mean, I read all of HP books, and enjoyed all of them, but I couldn’t even finish the first Twilight book, it seemed as if it there was no structure in writing the “book” or the chapters, talking about stuff just to fill the blanks, while in HP, you can find stuff that appeared in the first book, reappearing in the final book, you can feel the plot.
What you call lack of imagination is actually not overdoing it, coming up with names to every single object can be pretty much annoying for the readers. And I believe JK Rowling proved enough imagination through out the books.
Regardless of all these arguments, Harry potter > Twilight.
Harry Potter is better than Twilight, but I found it to be trite myself. I’ve read the Lord of the Rings, and it was taxing, but seeing the movies and reading the books again helped further my patience for reading the detail.
Essentially the difference between studying a great Renaissance piece for an hour, which may seem tedious, but well worth the knowledge, to seeing a piece of art done by a talented high schooler imitating the Renaissance piece. Twilight is the scribbles you do while taking notes in class.
E-Nerds just trying to hype themselves up with the ol’ I’m to cool to read Harry Potter but let me pick up this finger snapping book on starbucks coffee poetry cause thats hip. *snaps fingers* I haven’t read a Harry Potter book, didn’t care for the movies at first but its starting to grow on me. Its a great series for kids so you can’t compare it to Starwars which was directed towards young adults.
I’ve always liked Harry Potter. But the main thing that bothers me about twilight is not the story, it’s the girls and the vampires. How they act like they are vampires and think Edward or Jacob or what’s his face is going to be there husband. It’s just – Ughhhh. Another thing is how they totally screwed up Vampires. I’ve always liked Vampires and myths, but sparkling – WTF!
That’s exactly what I was thinking. I watched the first Twilight and found it kinda interesting except for the sparklyness. Now I fkn hate Twilight because ALL the girls around my age LOVE Edward or Jacob. It is so god damn annoying! >:(
see this poster its called vampires ” DO… NOT… SPARKLE
You need to be punched in the side of the head for three reasons.
1. For knowing exactly what Harry Potter movie this was taken from
2. For who Edward is and thus must also be a Twilight fan
3. For linking the two movies together in one synonymous homo erotic statement.
Do you seriously think that one should be a twilight fan to know who Edward is ?
And apparently you know all three?
xD It’s true – You have to know all three to know that he knows all three xD
Hey E-tard.. so you must be punched in the head three times cause you just committed all three acts
1. To make this assestment you also must have known which movie it was from.
2. Apparently you knew who Edward is to make such a comment. (everyone actually knows who edward is on this site not to mention Twilight is in the news, at burger king and vomiting out of fangirl’s mouths)
3. You just said Twilight and Harry Potter in the same post! WOot
Anyone who’s SEEN the movie knows what movie this was taken from. Some people who HAVEN’T seen the movie… still know what movie this was taken from!
lame
Harry Potter = Sence
tWHYlight = bullcrap….
tWHYlight, nicely done sir, you win the game
Minus points for “Sence”.
And now we all lost the game.
wrong!
http://xkcd.com/391/
XKCD win!
I’m sick of this “you all won the game” s**t. There’s a demotivational from 4chan where a guy claims it from doubles or something, too..
A comic making a joke or a guy who reposted repeatedly til the 10% chance went his way doesn’t render the game invalid, nor does it make it kewl to go on about it as if it’s true, or as if playing along with it is funny..
*twitch*
no now u lost the game i always win bc i hav “sence” lol jk jk
This is mainly a response to Justice; first off, would like to say, yes, the first 3 harry potter books are only so-so… what makes THEM survive is their level of immersion and interesting characters (most notable fred and george in my opinion, but I digress)… HOWEVER, once you start getting into book 4, JK Rowling’s becomes a far better WRITER, and the PLOTS grow up. So book 1-3 is a 11 to 13 year olds perspective… not very exciting, although it has its moments. but once Harry gets to be 14, and *SPOILER ALERT FOR NON HARRY POTTER FANS* Voldemort comes back, then things become darker, more mature, more intriguing, etc etc. The books grow from there
and Because I KNOW some1 is going to argue this, that harry is the most boring character ever, yes, he is. Because its FROM his point of view (albeit in 3rd person). The character growth is not nobody to somebody, or neutral to good in alignment. We don’t see any of that from HIS perspective. Or we don’t see MUCH of it. Point is, the growth we do see is in CAPABILITY. Because, frankly, unless your a self examining person, who ACTUALLY notices how they change in life? Just my 2 cents…
And yes, her imagination for certain names was limited, but ur forgetting Gringotts, Diagon Alley, Knockturn Alley, Hogwarts… etc etc. Chmicha was right, its hard to keep making up names. I as a writer can attest to that. And finally, what WOULD you call the invisibility cloak, other than an invisibility cloak?
So. There’s your ‘earful’ hope its more rational than you were expecting.
AND YES. DUH. I’m a HP fan
watch out everyone, khalis is writing a novel
Too long, Didn’t read…Gonna go play Call of Duty now. XD
modern warfare 2
tl;dr
I know there’s really no point to asking this, but, can’t someone love both HP and Twilight? Sure, neither will be confused for great literature, to stand the test of time. But both are a lot of fun.
I agree that HP comes into its own somewhere around the third book. And GoF is prolly my favorite of the 6 films. And not because of Pattinson. Twilight works for me because of the core romance. I sympathize with Bella’s mear-mindless determination to join Eds in eternity.
Personally, I get a chuckle out of all the hate. Stuff like Twilight + vuvuzelas. All the demotivators. I laugh. But I still enjoy the books. And am looking forward to reading #4, so no spoilers, please! ^.~
spoiler: Bella dies of childbirth and Edward went gay with Jacob.
…then fred phelps came and protested but he got mauled
ahahaha he i knew it could happen someone made something useful out of teh mess they call twhylight
actual spoiler: bella gets pregnant and edward performs a c-section on her with his teeth after which jacob marks the baby so he can f*** it when it becomes 8 or 9 and gets an adult body… for some reason.
yay google
I liked Democratic’s ending better, yours is just.. meh
too long, did not read
*gives a standing ovation*
Jk Rowling not Rowling’s*
also, remove AND before because I know. Sorry, but since I can’t edit the post directly, it was nagging at me to correct my own grammar where it was the worst. worse or worst?
hmmmmmmm.
he knew it was coming he tryed to save us but to grave misfortune he failed
Harry Potter is ten million times better than Twilight can ever hope to be. Infact, I posted on a Twilight YouTube vid, trolling the Twilight fans, once, saying how much better Harry Potter is, someone said that Harry Potter is good, but Twilight is better… what kind of drugs are Twilight fans on?
Twilight is better if you are in the market for something that sucks. See how that works? ^_^
Twilight IS better if you prefer angsty teen love drama over external conflict. Which I do not.
ten million times better than a zero is still a zero!
Twilight=12 yr olds having sexual fantasies with vampires… F***, I can’t spell fantasies right…Or can I??
no thats how edward really died… cedric came back as the vampire
gaypire*
WIN
I really hate it when people compare Twilight and HP.
I like both, and both of them have their strong and weak points.
Twilight: Edward or Jacob? Everyone knows who she chooses by reading the last sentence of the third book.
HP: Daniel looked and sounded like a girl for the first two movies, and there are so many cheesy moments that I lost track.
*kills* twilight is CRAP!!!
FAIL you read twilight.
Why are is everyone arguing over twilight and Harry Potter when there are more important and significant problems within the societies we live in?
…Justin Bieber is still alive!
Harry Potter > Justin Bieber > Twilight > The Jonas Brothers
You pot heads need to stop imagining stuff!
Harry actually cried his eyes out when Cedrick died!
Morons
No he didn’t, because he is a book and movie character. Harry doesn’t even have an opinion of Twilight, because of the aforementioned being a book and movie character.
Cedrick is a harry potter character.
NOOO! THEY’RE REAL!
common… dont ruin the fun! I know they don’t exist in real life, im just tryin’ to make a point to these twilight haters.
Gosh, you got nothing better to do?
As we say in Norway: Fritids…………
Which means BTW (for those jarheads who dont know the language of that is called norwegia): sparetime problems
*norwegian
sorry, typing fail
Norwegia :3
Harry did cry his eyes out when Cedric died. You see, Cedric is also a Harry Potter character. Also, you have no sense of fun.
He cried in sympathy because he knew Cedric was doomed to be reincarnated into a tween romance hero with a higher ratio of angst to external conflict for ALL ETERNITY.
I really wish I had some Internets to give you :c
Potter is plagiarized crap engineered by at least a half-dozen hack writers and promoted and protected by the British establishment including the BBC and you have all been BRAINWASHED!
Correction: Voldemort hates Twilight. Harry just made sure everybody saw.
And y’know, I actually kind of like Pattinson better in Harry Potter than in Twilight. It’s the character. I’ve read all of the Harry Potter books and all but the ending of the last Twilight book. I love Harry Potter, but not enough that I stuff it up everyone’s asses wherever I go. I’m not a fan of Twilight(various spelling/grammar errors, etc.) but I don’t shove my opinion up fangirl’s asses either.
They’re fricking books, get the hell over it and get a life.
Now, I’m off to play sims tyvm.
Life is overrated.
I just realized. I haven’t read a cult phenominon book in more than ten years, yet I still know who the hell these people are!
Curse you, Internet! DX
I am a big HP fan, the HP books are much better written and planned out than the twilight books. As you read the series (And I admitt the first three books are a little kid-ish) it does become darker, more intense, and more interesting.
As far as the movies go, the first movie was done by a different director than the one that is directing them now, obviously there is a big difference…
Twilight is just not that well written, it’s like a ten year old could have written that. Stephanie Meyer is just successful because, too many people are idiots. I don’t care if you like Twilight, but I had those fanatics……
I admit I snickered a bit when I read that Voldemort hates Twilight.
I agree with Justice and Ivy. In HP, you could see the growth of the writing and the characters as the story progressed and the ending wasn’t an epic squick and failfest like it was in Twilight.
Meyer’s work reads like a teenage girl’s sexual fantasies that should have been edited properly to even bring it up to some kind of conclusion. The one reason why they’re successful is because a lot of women never outgrew that teenage angst and being in love with a guy who clearly is a contender for a restraining order. If you’re a 16 year old…I can see why you’d want to read this. But as an older woman…oh lord…
This scene is from “Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire”
Robert Pattinson was really in this film!
this is Robert Pattinson’s 3rd film.
before he was Edward from twilight
NUH UH. THE POTTER SERIES HAD HIM FIRST, TYVM.
Kids like 6-13 are down with HP then there’s a stretch from 13-18 where you’re a teenage retard who determinedly does not like Harry Potter because it might ruin your social standing with your fellow retard friends, then when you’re an adult you realize how much of a retard you were and give it a shot..
Anyone who says HP is as bad as Twilight probably hasn’t read them.
HA HA HA HA HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! LAAAAAAAAAAAWL! This is some funny s**t!
Harry Potter doesn’t make JRR Tolkien facepalm in his grave. The same can NOT be said for Bram Stoker when it comes to Twilight.
at least the rob guy doesnt sparkle in this…
yes. twilight isnt a very good series. most people can agree on that. but you must think, that since it’s never going to be amazing, no matter what they do with it, but it still is so popular, there will always be ppl who will hate it. (another example is justin bieber) but HP is different, it is told from a guys point of view as he grows up. HE’S 11 WHEN IT ALL STARTS! i mean, it’s not supposed to be super mature in the first books, because you’re not at that age. and when you think about it, the whole series is layers upon layers of creativity. (i know imma dork, but i’ve been asked before so i know) the names she comes up with have meaning behind them. she creates this magical world…different from any other kind. most people when they read it, only get the first sketch, not the whole picture. if you’ve read the books more than once, you get the whole idea she’s made. and everything that goes along with it. and people shouldn’t EVER rate a book on what the movies like. yes daniel sounded like a girl the first 2 movies. becasue he was 11 when they started. it’s caled: he hadn’t gone through puberty. (i can go on, but i won’t. bc i’m saving you from my dorkishly large amt of knowledge on this series)
It’s very sad. And HP > Twilight. Sorry, twihards. I’d take interesting (though sometimes predictable) characters and an original, interesting world over OMG HE’S SPARKLY any day of the week.
Well… With the face he’s got on, maybe Harry Potter is into the necrophiliac part of Twilight, anyway.
That is one of the 42 thousend reasons that HP is WAAAAY better than Twilight.
As do I:)
WELL IT’S ABOUT F**KING TIME!
I’ve made it a personal mission to hate Twilight with a passion for the rest of my natural life but after being forced to watch Eclipse by a friend’s gf I actually had a critic for it that wasn’t based off my loathing of the franchise. At times the action and what not would get somewhat decent really, but then it would always without fail be quickly demolished, trampled, and utterly raped by the actors poor acting. The lines while they made sense for whatever scene it was, sounded horrid and unconvincing. While the story is still a steaming pile of festering vampire glitter, could have been a lot better if the people playing the roles didn’t suck. As far as HP goes, love the books, great story that you can really get in to. Though the movies (not including 1 and 2) I don’t really care for. They strayed to far from the book in key detailing and what not. 1 and 2 stuck pretty close to the books. Plus original Dumbledore was way better then his replacement.
WIN+++
Voldemort is ‘Team Jacob’.