MEN BEWARE
this is our future
Incorrect source or offensive?
-
-
Copy & paste this:
-
Recent Comments
Jango-feta-salad on UNIBROW Lugburzz on ROUNDABOUTS no1zyyy on ZOMBIES ZERO Weeble on MOMENTS LIKE THESE Naietz on ROUNDABOUTS Weeble on I’VE SEEN ENOUGH HE… pogostick on DRUGS pogostick on SPOT Wobbleglobble on IN THE OLD DAYS mvdejong on ROUNDABOUTS
More MEMEBASE
Memebase - All Your Memes Are In Our Base
Involuntary Emancipation
This Is Photobomb - Surprise! Ruined Photos
That's a Nice Looking Lady
GraphJam - Music & Culture for People Who Love Charts
Not Sure If I Should Try to Console or Run
Señor Gif - Funny Animated GIFs
One More Avengers Spoiler
Picture Is Unrelated - Funny WTF Pictures
Classic: Mr. Whiskers Will Thank You
Comixed - Vertical 4 Pane Comics
Boromir Does Not Simply Train His Pet
Derp - All the Derp Durr Hurr that's fit to Derp
FURRRN.
Art of Trolling - Trolls on Chatroulette and Yahoo! Answers
Two in the Pink
Go Cry Emo Kid - Go Cry Emo Kids
Seems Legit
Superheroes - Superheroes
I'm Going to Go Home and Do That Too
Rage Comics - Express Your Rage
More Bang for Your Buck
Pokémemes - I choose you!
You Won't Like Me When I'm Crying
meh, it won’t affect me. I’ll be dead by then
^ Pfft. Not my problem.
personally, i think men deserve it for what they have done to women for so long
I do not like using this argument, but….
Nature. Men are naturally physically stronger than females. Men acquired food for the females in exchange for the passage of their genes. This meant the females’ survival was dependent on their male counterpart. Today, though, men are equal to women in all aspects (though I will say men still develop muscles quicker due to DNA but doesn’t mean they’re the strongest; and most economies don’t pay them equally). So for our first million(s of) years of life, females were dependent for a good reason. Then the 1970s or so came along and destroyed that aspect making us all equal.
Once again, I hate using this argument because it makes me sound like a sexist. I like the equality of genders in all aspects as I have little pride based on my gender.
I truly wish I had the option of being a stay at home mom but the 70s pretty much ruined that by turning many households into two income households thus causing the cost of living to go up or single income households where (typically the woman) either depend upon the government to act in the role of the male or are a single wage earner and primary bread winner who must now depend upon a daycare and a government run school to raise the children.
The only thing the 70s did was turn our mothers into secretaries after they had kids instead of until they had kids. Beyond that im not seeing a whole lot of benefit. And no I don’t want to hear a lecture about womens lib. That primarily led to increased abortion and teen pregnancy.
Not gonna change my mind. Don’t try.
will you marry me ?
only a man can write such a stupid thing. get prepared to your new gay life.
you would be surprised to know how many womans don’t like feminism !
well modern feminism is def not what it used to be. i must say that in my opinion, feminism has changed too much. it went from being about actual equality to trying to outdue or improve things for women more than men. equality is worth striving for.
Actually, it makes you sound wrong. No offense
In hunter-gatherer societies, women provide around 90 % of the food and it’s reasonable to assume that has always been the case, even in a time when there was only hunter-gatherer societies. Men usually do the hunting, though, providing protein and fat, however this has less to do with men being stronger than with women necessarily staying close to the children in a living situation where breastfeeding is more important for a longer time and where the number of births per mother was higher.
^This
This. No idea what male-oriented anthropology this kid was taking, but in most societies both males and females are responsible for collecting food (men hunting, women gathering). Also, sexual dimorphism has more to do with male-to-male competition over females rather than anything to do with “protection” of them or anything that would have made the females dependent on the males.
Females could have been disbanded from men a long time before the 1970s. We’ve been an intelligent species for more than 40 years (well, that’s arguable I guess). However, when half of society is controlled by people who believe you are inferior in almost any way and that is your sole responsibility to bear and raise children, it takes a long while to break that.
And MenotYou, as a college educated female going to get her PhD in some aspect of Neuroscience (not yet decided) I can only laugh at you saying that the only thing it did was turn our mothers into secretaries. Sweetie, maybe you should’ve worked a little harder in high school and stopped dreaming of popping out babies and you wouldn’t be a secretary. The rest of us are quite happy to have the opportunity to actually do something in this world other than reproduce and sweep floors.
^This, so hard.
Katie,
Bad news. I have a BA in Economics and an MBA. My son, 9 years old, is the pride of my life and there is no work that I could ever do outside the home that will equal the contribution to society that he is.
Having said that, when he graduates I will only be 40 (you see, I had to work my way through college with the help of my parents) and when that happens I will have all the time in the world to have any career I want.
The problem with woman’s lib is that it tells women they can only be proud of what they do outside the home and that our children are the least important part of what we do… if we want to be enlightened. Consider how many children are raised by daycare (women) and public schools (mostly liberal women).
We need to return to the idea that men and women are created equal but have separate ways of approaching the world. There is absolutely nothing wrong with putting our family first. And anyone who claims otherwise is brain-washed, ignorant or both.
Regarding being secretary’s and such, besides the obvious argument that women spend less time in the work force and generally have less experience due to this, why are so many secretarial, call center, cashier, retail positions held by women? Why is the female VP still considered a rarity? Because I don’t think most women really want to work that hard but are shamed into believing that they’re not the equals of men if they don’t.
And in most cases a degree doesn’t mean squat considering that so many schools are liberal bastions of idiocy. And yes, I went to one. Just because I don’t follow the generally held beliefs doesn’t mean I’m stupid or ignorant. Nice open mindedness.
Why are the majority of people working in fields that deal with children women? Well, likely because women tend to like children more than men do.
Personally, I don’t think that there’s anything WRONG with putting your family first. The problem is when you get little to no choice in the matter. Some people don’t even WANT families, be they male or female. Whether someone wants to be a stay-home mom (or) dad) or a working parent (or a working anything) should be an individual choice, not a social expectation.
“Why is the female VP still considered a rarity? Because I don’t think most women really want to work that hard but are shamed into believing that they’re not the equals of men if they don’t.”
I think it has more to do with the fact that women have yet to gain enough influence for many of them to attain high positions. There ARE still quite a lot of old men up top who still can’t get away from the old “Men-in-power” mentality that they were raised on, whether they want to or not.
“considering that so many schools are liberal bastions of idiocy”
….okay? Shall I assume that you’re one of those individuals who want to bring mandatory prayer back to public schools, or would that be an assumption that’s as offensive as the words I just quoted?
“Why are the majority of people working in fields that deal with children women? Well, likely because women tend to like children more than men do.”
You should check history before saying that.
In the 18th century european women give up their child to some nanny until they were 6or seven, and the took them back just a little to send them a few years later to boarding school. In french society it was even see as a bad thing, if you loved your child before they were considered as adult.
That’s a philosophe named Rousseau who amongst a few others first spoke about maternal love and women dedicated to children. Before it was not less sexist, it’s just that women were supposed to be dedicated to their work and husband (without loving him and inversely or even sexually desired each other).
I was referring largely to how women TODAY tend to like children more than men do. Females of all species tend to have at least some semblance of motherly instinct. Of course, today’s cultures tend to label any man who willingly works close to children as a potential paedophile and that will likely play a big role in statistics.
In history, the way women of many cultures (mostly western) have handled their children was probably based equally on male views and societal standards as it was based on values. Living standards were poor back then so I’m guessing that many women who temporarily (or permanently) gave their children to be looked after by someone else did so because they had too little money to feed them and had to dedicate a lot of their time working, despite the view that women should look after the house and the kids while the men worked.
Hell, children back then were often sent to do work when they were as young as five and it was accepted because it was a necessity.
katie, I think you’re awesome for this^ comment.
“men still develop muscles quicker due to DNA but doesn’t mean they’re the strongest”
I’m pretty sure the average man is still stronger than the average woman, and that while the strongest women are much stronger than the average man, they’re still a lot weaker than the strongest men.
There’s PC and then there’s reality…
(not touching the “quicker” statement, I have to double-check but I think it’s the other way around)
I am a couch potato man, and have only met one woman that equaled my strength and she lifted weights in high school and was built like a Fantasy dwarf.
But if it was strength that mattered, then there would be far fewer abused men and abused large women. No amount of muscle can defend against a knife in the guts while you are sleeping.
Women were dependent on men for millions of years? That makes sense, cause it’s pretty easy to bear and raise one’s children while ranging across acres and acres of land daily to track game and gather food.
There is the man-the-hunter hypothesis. There is also the woman-the-gatherer hypothesis. If you actually read journal articles on the subject, many believe that agriculture was started by women, as the men were out hunting.
Also, biologically, men should have to present themselves as fit to women. Women are worth more than men in terms of gametes, since women create eggs, which are large and well provisioned. Also, there are a lot less of them, compared to the male gamete -sp*rm, which are tiny, ill-provisioned and there’s heaps of them.
Also, modern day humans have only been around for 200,000 years. “millions of years” doesn’t make sense, unless you’re including the likes of erectus, habilis, and the australopithecines. Derp derp herp derp.
Flawed argument is flawed.
Do white people deserve to be slaves for what they did to blacks?
White people were already enslaved before they got the chance to enslave black people.
Most black slaves were sold to whites by blacks.
Feminism in a nut shell: Sexism is bad, but people who’ve never done it and often weren’t even alive during the time you refer to are responsible for the sexism of others due to their sex (unless they’re women, of course).
Seems legit.
Don’t forget the “Equal treatment should mean I get better treatment than you”
Feminism is not feminazism. Only ignorant bigots equate the two.
So, tit-for-tat is quality?
EQUALITY..
Bloody typos!
Watch out, trollbait!
Your man-card —- REVOKED !!!
+40
How is it our fault?, its women’s fault, who raises the children that one day will become adults? women, who shows what is right and wrong to his child? women. An @sshole is the result of bad parenthood.
Tell me who do you attribute your actual personality? your father?, most likely not, your mother or the feminine figure in your life dictates a lot of your personality.
In short words, if women ALLOW sexism, if they dont stand up to it, they bring it on themselves.
Words from my English teacher, who is a feminist.
Besides, what have I done to deserve it?
Sorry you had an absentee father. Many of us had loving dads that helped form our personalities rather than just half our genome.
Source?
Seconded
Rocket Cadet School is future speak for a class on how to operate d!ldos…women aren’t smart enough to operate them, so that’s why he can’t go.
That’s supposed to be Science Fiction, not Fantasy….
Funny thing, this was originally the idea of french writer George Sand. It’s kinda sad to see it as a comic nobody seems to know. Also, this is not sexism, it’s explanation by inversion (quite a wonderful concept) it does not refer to a feminism utopia, it’s just a way to criticize what we are. Or, should I say were, because this comic is obviously quite old.
^ this
This is SO wrong. He’s not wearing an apron.
Angel One anyone?
Until you leave wanting to oppress alone, you are always going to be afraid people will do it to you. During the strongest time of female repression in Euro history, we had the darkest philiosophies that called from every person for themselves/every hand is born to be against you. Whereas if are generous to the light in all humans, you will find it is a very bright fire indeed. BUT since you would rather there were a hierarchy, you will always always always fear being at the bottom of it. Leave it alone, like a poison, and you find yourself more fit and more healthy. Or stay at the table, I don’t care. I live in brillant sunshine as a full human. Stay in the stable and eat horse dung; I am not affected by your diet at all. But don’t confuse your chains are doing anything but holding you back. Also – STFU. Also – ‘rocket school’ – if you know what I mean…
uuh…what? did you use an online translator or something? can we get the text in it’s original language to see if it makes more sense ?
All this equality here and equality there…why can’t people see, that we are different from each other? Yes, we are all humans, and should treated like that. But there are smart people, strong people, I don’t know. There are small, tall fat thin etc. And there are females and males. I’m too young to see that difference what caused all the trouble in the 70′ otherwise the two genders are NOT equal.
Males can be stupid, woman can be smart, males can be weakling and womans can be strong, and males can become good cooks, or could tend to the housework and females could earn a fortune. But who said they couldn’t?! That’s old times history for me.
The problem is that most of the people in power are old-timers who DID grow up with the mentality that men work and women look after the house. Women DO have a lot more power and opportunity today but they still tend to have to work harder for it than men. Hopefully, this will all even itself out when the aforementioned old-timers are gone.
There are no boys in the internet, boys belong to the kitchen and they should make sammiches
THIS!
Men of today, WTF has happened to your pride? How about you put down the McDonald’s and Xbox control and get your t-levels up. P-u-s-s-i-e-s!
Well I can’t speak for eveyone but pride is a deadly sin; it is good that I don’t have much.
I agree that pride is a deadly sin, pride as in arrogance. I meant pride as in some self respect. Men today seem too passive, less ambitious and too many are outright push-overs. It seems to me like the media is painting men as bumbling, overweight buffoons and from what I see in everyday life, they might be on to something. Men need to grow a pair, show some initiative and be men.
that’s because most mens of today where raised by womans ( of the feminist generation ) , that’s probably why most mens in the western world are giant pus*ys .
This is mostly because men are too afraid to speak up, because they’ll be called “sexists” or “chauvinists”. They’re taught from a young age to just sit quietly while feminists work, because this will make everyone “equal”.
they must want a lot of rocket crashes in the future.
comment of the day
He should just stay in the kitchen.
Lol men are stronger then women…Come at us Bro
If this means they’ll pay for dinner then I’m all for it.
This will be the future…
Logically seen, men are somehow redundent.
I don’t know if it was just joke, that you can impregnate a womens ovum with another ones now. But if this is true, men are really screwed.
I personaly fear our future as men.
I hope I will be dead before this happens
Most men can’t be trusted with the cleaning and domestic chores. We will only keep you for those moments when “toys” don’t suffice.
We got ourselves a troll over here!
Was this made by an OWS proteste…. flunky. “Past the roles” not “passed the roles” – unless they are really tasty rolls.
Close enough:
Women ARE able to handle higher G-force stress than men.
http://www.madsci.org/posts/archives/2005-09/1126559875.Bp.r.html