Thank God I’m not the only one who thinks that. Honestly, why would you develop fangs that waste half of the precious nutrients you are trying to absorb?
Neither of them belong. According to the legend (at least, the east European legend), male vampires are supposed to be extremely handsome. They’re “homme fatales”, in a sense. So the one on the left doesn’t work. However, they sure as hell dont sparkle and dont have super speed. But unlike what Demonas said, vampires dont need long teeth either. For example, the Scottish Baobhan Sith vampires use their fingernails to suck blood. So Edward not having fangs isn’t really important.
Only in the “romantic vampire” sub-genre. I for one have always hated that type of vampire. I’ve always thought of the romantic vampire sub-genre as being akin to a teenager with parasitic tendencies, being as lust driven as it made them seem. Also, drinking through fangs would actually be very inefficient, if clean, because it would mean that after death a whole new set of muscles would have to be developed to cause the suction through the hollow teeth. Using and enhancing the existing jaw muscles would make more sense and many sharp or serrated teeth would allow faster access to the source of nutrition.
Plus, what would be scarier, a reflection-less playboy who wants to stick something of his only into your girlfriend’s carotid or an apex predator with super strength, speed, and senses who sees all people as nothing but a food source? If not for the fear it causes, what good is a vampire anyway? Granted, neither of these examples leaves room for a sparkly blood-sucker who only wants it if it can be sucked out of a pen!s.
The 30 Days of Night type vampire (the one on the left) is the vampire I would fear most, unless the sparkly one has r@pe in mind.
Left. I think that’s a vamo from 30 days of night, which wasn’t a half bad film in all honesty. Nothing will compare to John Carpenter’s Vampires or the Lugosi films, but 30DOA certainly kicks Twilight’s sparkly virgin ass.
one makes a good horror movie
another makes people shatt thier pants from the movie plot and everything about twilight
pretty obvious which is which
plus the girl in the movie twilight was pretty damm butt-a$$ ugly and should die a horrible, painful death
Technically vampires were evil, unrest-ed spirits rising from the grave to seek vengeance on those that mistreated them. So neither, in all technicality. I see where you’re going with this, though. And since we’re picking teams, here, here’s one for team Nosferatu.
As far as I looked: NO explosions, NO car races, NO b00bs and NO fncking action…. worst movie ever. I’m so glad to live in the era of computer effects and REAL block busters !!!
You gotta remember, this was back in the 20s. They didn’t have the special effects we have now. They couldn’t really do car chases because the fastest a car could go back then was about 15 mph.
You cannot make a “which one does not belong” with just two examples. Technically, you can pick either way since you’ve only got TWO options. There needs to be a third that is similar to one of the examples shown.
Both. The right one is a christmas decoration and the left one’s teeth are not usable for drinking blood – he’s rather a zombie.
Thank God I’m not the only one who thinks that. Honestly, why would you develop fangs that waste half of the precious nutrients you are trying to absorb?
christmas decoration? smoking what are you?
C:\Users\Jake\Downloads\alucard.jpg
Makes both of them look like wimps.
Lucas uses local drive path.
It’s not very effective.
lmao
HAHAHAHHA
First time on a computer, eh?
The creepy thing is that exactly this file name exist at this location on my machine too.
Not.
That is the stupidiest form of joke ever invented, to end a plain statement with a negative.
Not.
Seriously,WTF….
hurrrrrrr!
Neither of them belong. According to the legend (at least, the east European legend), male vampires are supposed to be extremely handsome. They’re “homme fatales”, in a sense. So the one on the left doesn’t work. However, they sure as hell dont sparkle and dont have super speed. But unlike what Demonas said, vampires dont need long teeth either. For example, the Scottish Baobhan Sith vampires use their fingernails to suck blood. So Edward not having fangs isn’t really important.
Only in the “romantic vampire” sub-genre. I for one have always hated that type of vampire. I’ve always thought of the romantic vampire sub-genre as being akin to a teenager with parasitic tendencies, being as lust driven as it made them seem. Also, drinking through fangs would actually be very inefficient, if clean, because it would mean that after death a whole new set of muscles would have to be developed to cause the suction through the hollow teeth. Using and enhancing the existing jaw muscles would make more sense and many sharp or serrated teeth would allow faster access to the source of nutrition.
Plus, what would be scarier, a reflection-less playboy who wants to stick something of his only into your girlfriend’s carotid or an apex predator with super strength, speed, and senses who sees all people as nothing but a food source? If not for the fear it causes, what good is a vampire anyway? Granted, neither of these examples leaves room for a sparkly blood-sucker who only wants it if it can be sucked out of a pen!s.
The 30 Days of Night type vampire (the one on the left) is the vampire I would fear most, unless the sparkly one has r@pe in mind.
Sparkly one have only confusion in mind.
WRONG
the one on the right is a fairy who’s hidding his wings and wand
And I’m eternally grateful that the movies kept his wand hidden. *nudge nudge*
This again? Look, Twilight sucks, that’s been obvious for SOOOOOOO long, but hasn’t this sort of thing been done beyond death? Let Twilight die.
Meyer wrote even worse books with nearly identical plots to the Twilight saga. If we let Twilight die, those other books might get movie adaptations.
Neither. Team Dracula!
Team Belmont, ’nuff said.
GTFO Richter.
Left. I think that’s a vamo from 30 days of night, which wasn’t a half bad film in all honesty. Nothing will compare to John Carpenter’s Vampires or the Lugosi films, but 30DOA certainly kicks Twilight’s sparkly virgin ass.
one is creepy as hell that makes me want to brit shicks, and the other one doesn’t sparkle.
I see what you did there.
Neither one belongs. VAMPIRES! AREN’T! REAL!
^THIS
+4
one makes a good horror movie
another makes people shatt thier pants from the movie plot and everything about twilight
pretty obvious which is which
plus the girl in the movie twilight was pretty damm butt-a$$ ugly and should die a horrible, painful death
Technically vampires were evil, unrest-ed spirits rising from the grave to seek vengeance on those that mistreated them. So neither, in all technicality. I see where you’re going with this, though. And since we’re picking teams, here, here’s one for team Nosferatu.
I thought those were revenants. Then again, I’m probably thinking too hard about this…
Neither. This is a real vampire: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rcyzubFvBsA
As far as I looked: NO explosions, NO car races, NO b00bs and NO fncking action…. worst movie ever. I’m so glad to live in the era of computer effects and REAL block busters !!!
You gotta remember, this was back in the 20s. They didn’t have the special effects we have now. They couldn’t really do car chases because the fastest a car could go back then was about 15 mph.
I know they did not have the opportunities, but this does not make the movies from this era better…
You cannot make a “which one does not belong” with just two examples. Technically, you can pick either way since you’ve only got TWO options. There needs to be a third that is similar to one of the examples shown.
HA! I’m the biggest internet tightwad so far!
http://mistress0812.deviantart.com/art/Very-Demotivational-282625929
The one on the left, because real vampire movies are love stories not just violence.
vampires? all i see is a vampire and a stalkerhomosparklefairy.